I saw that the TSAS field, byte#1 (RDMA Provider Type - RDMA_PRTYPE) value is 0 (not
We expect that this value will be 2 (Infiniband RoCEV2).
Everything is working properly and we succeeded to connect but I just wanted to verify
that the 'not specified' value is OK and supports Infiniband RoCEV2.
From: Michal BenHaim <michal.benhaim(a)kaminario.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2019 11:42 AM
To: Limor Halutzi <Limor.Halutzi(a)kaminario.com>
Subject: Fw: [SPDK] Comparing discovery log page to the spec definition
Michal Ben Haim
From: Walker, Benjamin <benjamin.walker(a)intel.com>
Sent: Friday, August 9, 2019 7:26 PM
Cc: Michal BenHaim
Subject: Re: [SPDK] Comparing discovery log page to the spec definition
On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 12:54 +0000, Limor Halutzi wrote:
I am working on comparing the discovery log page to the spec and I noticed
that there is a trello task on this issue (Audit and make fully spec compliant
the implementation of the Discovery Log Page) and I have some questions:
1. TREQ (byte 03) - We don't need a secure session and in our system this
field is set to not specified (0).
Do we need to change it to not required (2)?
I think we should change this to not required as you indicate, but what we're
returning seems technically correct.
What is the different between these two options?
2. I compared the log page entry struct with the log page entry from the
spec and they are the same.
In addition, I checked that the values are valid to my machine.
What is required to close this task?
I moved it to closed. Thanks!
SPDK mailing list