5:08 p.m.
Hi,
I noticed some compilation issues & then fio failure when I used SPDK
v18.10 along with DPDK v18.11 with some RDMA failures.
1) Is SPDKv18.10 compatible with DPDK v17.11 (LTS)
2) Is SPDK 18.10 supported for DPDK 18.11
Thanks in advance.
--
Regards,
Rajesh
3:32 p.m.
-----Original Message-----
From: SPDK [mailto:spdk-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Rajesh Ravi
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 10:08 AM
To: spdk(a)lists.01.org
Cc: Nitin Shrivastav <nitin.shrivastav(a)broadcom.com>; Scott Branden
<scott.branden(a)broadcom.com>; Andy Fung <andy.fung(a)broadcom.com>;
Jonathan Richardson <jonathan.richardson(a)broadcom.com>; Vikram Prakash
<vikram.prakash(a)broadcom.com>
Subject: [SPDK] SPDKv18.10 & compatibility with DPDK versions
Hi,
I noticed some compilation issues & then fio failure when I used SPDK
v18.10 along with DPDK v18.11 with some RDMA failures.
1) Is SPDKv18.10 compatible with DPDK v17.11 (LTS)
Yes
2) Is SPDK 18.10 supported for DPDK 18.11
No. We usually do a follow up release (18.10.x) that adds support.
Thanks,
Ben
Thanks in advance.
--
Regards,
Rajesh
_______________________________________________
SPDK mailing list
SPDK(a)lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk
5:46 p.m.
On Nov 30, 2018, at 9:32 AM, Walker, Benjamin
<benjamin.walker(a)intel.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SPDK [mailto:spdk-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Rajesh Ravi
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 10:08 AM
> To: spdk(a)lists.01.org
> Cc: Nitin Shrivastav <nitin.shrivastav(a)broadcom.com>; Scott Branden
> <scott.branden(a)broadcom.com>; Andy Fung <andy.fung(a)broadcom.com>;
> Jonathan Richardson <jonathan.richardson(a)broadcom.com>; Vikram Prakash
> <vikram.prakash(a)broadcom.com>
> Subject: [SPDK] SPDKv18.10 & compatibility with DPDK versions
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed some compilation issues & then fio failure when I used SPDK
> v18.10 along with DPDK v18.11 with some RDMA failures.
>
> 1) Is SPDKv18.10 compatible with DPDK v17.11 (LTS)
Yes
>
> 2) Is SPDK 18.10 supported for DPDK 18.11
No. We usually do a follow up release (18.10.x) that adds support.
Thanks,
Ben
Looks so far that we are still at DPDK 18.08, both in master and v18.10.x branch.
Is anyone working toward moving our DPDK submodule version to 18.11?
Noting Ben's response of "No" to "18.10 supported for DPDK 18.11",
should we modify the spdk.spec file in v18.10.x such that the dependency on DPDK is
constrained to prevent such installation? Currently, the spec file only limits the dpdk
version to be >= 17.11.
--
Lance
557
days inactive
593
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Lance Hartmann ORACLE -
Rajesh Ravi -
Walker, Benjamin