1:13 p.m.
Hi,
After the last meeting, we said it would be interesting to have
patchwork to easily list pending patches with their status and not
having to maintain the list manually.
I contacted Patchwork maintainers and it seems they are OK to add MPTCP
to the list of projects. But they are asking 2 questions:
- do you want all of your team to have maintainer status in
patchwork? (ie, should they all be able to update patch states?)
I don't know exactly who would need to have this. I guess everybody who
did a review with an "accept" ("LGTM") should be able to directly
change
the status, no?
Patchwork maintainers are asking me to give them a list of usernames.
With the web interface, I can only get your user ID and email address
but not your username. May you reply to me in private (or to the list)
with your username?
(The username you used to log-in: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org )
I didn't find any user account for Peter and Ossama. I don't know if you
would like to be added to the list of people who can change the status
of the pending patches for the kernel but if yes, you can create an
account on the website:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/register/
- are you able to subscribe <email> to your mailing list,
without
requiring a confirmation step?
I guess that's a question for Mat :)
Cheers,
Matt
--
Matthieu Baerts | R&D Engineer
matthieu.baerts(a)tessares.net
Tessares SA | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
1 Avenue Jean Monnet, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
8:06 p.m.
Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts(a)tessares.net> wrote:
I contacted Patchwork maintainers and it seems they are OK to add
MPTCP to
the list of projects.
Thanks Matthieu.
But they are asking 2 questions:
> - do you want all of your team to have maintainer status in patchwork?
(ie, should they all be able to update patch states?)
I don't know exactly who would need to have this. I guess everybody who did
a review with an "accept" ("LGTM") should be able to directly change
the
status, no?
Note that anyone who has a patchwork account can change patch status of
changes they submitted themselves.
Patchwork maintainers are asking me to give them a list of usernames.
With
the web interface, I can only get your user ID and email address but not
your username. May you reply to me in private (or to the list) with your
username?
Mine is "strlen".
8:25 a.m.
Hi Florian,
On 21/10/2019 22:06, Florian Westphal wrote:
Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts(a)tessares.net> wrote:
> I contacted Patchwork maintainers and it seems they are OK to add MPTCP to
> the list of projects.
Thanks Matthieu.
> But they are asking 2 questions:
>
>> - do you want all of your team to have maintainer status in patchwork?
> (ie, should they all be able to update patch states?)
>
> I don't know exactly who would need to have this. I guess everybody who did
> a review with an "accept" ("LGTM") should be able to directly
change the
> status, no?
Note that anyone who has a patchwork account can change patch status of
changes they submitted themselves.
Good to know, that's a useful feature!
> Patchwork maintainers are asking me to give them a list of
usernames. With
> the web interface, I can only get your user ID and email address but not
> your username. May you reply to me in private (or to the list) with your
> username?
Mine is "strlen".
Thank you, added to the list!
Cheers,
Matt
--
Matthieu Baerts | R&D Engineer
matthieu.baerts(a)tessares.net
Tessares SA | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
1 Avenue Jean Monnet, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
8:12 p.m.
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
Hi,
After the last meeting, we said it would be interesting to have patchwork to
easily list pending patches with their status and not having to maintain the
list manually.
I contacted Patchwork maintainers and it seems they are OK to add MPTCP to
the list of projects. But they are asking 2 questions:
> - do you want all of your team to have maintainer status in patchwork? (ie,
should they all be able to update patch states?)
I don't know exactly who would need to have this. I guess everybody who did a
review with an "accept" ("LGTM") should be able to directly change
the
status, no?
Sure, that sounds reasonable. I think people will be responsible :)
Patchwork maintainers are asking me to give them a list of usernames.
With
the web interface, I can only get your user ID and email address but not your
username. May you reply to me in private (or to the list) with your username?
(The username you used to log-in: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org )
I didn't find any user account for Peter and Ossama. I don't know if you
would like to be added to the list of people who can change the status of the
pending patches for the kernel but if yes, you can create an account on the
website:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/register/
> - are you able to subscribe <email> to your mailing list, without
requiring a confirmation step?
I guess that's a question for Mat :)
The mailing list is currently configured to send a subscription
confirmation message with a URL, but I can turn that off if needed
(temporarily maybe?). I think the confirmation step is helpful for
preventing abuse.
--
Mat Martineau
Intel
8:34 a.m.
Hi Mat,
On 21/10/2019 22:12, Mat Martineau wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After the last meeting, we said it would be interesting to have
> patchwork to easily list pending patches with their status and not
> having to maintain the list manually.
>
> I contacted Patchwork maintainers and it seems they are OK to add
> MPTCP to the list of projects. But they are asking 2 questions:
>
>> - do you want all of your team to have maintainer status in
>> patchwork? (ie,
> should they all be able to update patch states?)
>
> I don't know exactly who would need to have this. I guess everybody
> who did a review with an "accept" ("LGTM") should be able to
directly
> change the status, no?
>
Sure, that sounds reasonable. I think people will be responsible :)
Me too!
> Patchwork maintainers are asking me to give them a list of
usernames.
> With the web interface, I can only get your user ID and email address
> but not your username. May you reply to me in private (or to the list)
> with your username?
>
> (The username you used to log-in: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org )
>
> I didn't find any user account for Peter and Ossama. I don't know if
> you would like to be added to the list of people who can change the
> status of the pending patches for the kernel but if yes, you can
> create an account on the website:
>
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/register/
>
>> - are you able to subscribe <email> to your mailing list, without
> requiring a confirmation step?
>
> I guess that's a question for Mat :)
The mailing list is currently configured to send a subscription
confirmation message with a URL, but I can turn that off if needed
(temporarily maybe?). I think the confirmation step is helpful for
preventing abuse.
Is it not possible to force someone to be subscribed?
If you disable the option you mentioned, I guess Patchwork maintainer
will need to send an email with a specific message to our ML, right? (I
don't know if what you mentioned is enough)
Cheers,
Matt
--
Matthieu Baerts | R&D Engineer
matthieu.baerts(a)tessares.net
Tessares SA | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
1 Avenue Jean Monnet, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
8:45 a.m.
Hi Mat,
On 22/10/2019 10:34, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
On 21/10/2019 22:12, Mat Martineau wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
[...]
>> Patchwork maintainers are asking me to give them a list of
usernames.
>> With the web interface, I can only get your user ID and email address
>> but not your username. May you reply to me in private (or to the
>> list) with your username?
>>
>> (The username you used to log-in: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org )
>>
>> I didn't find any user account for Peter and Ossama. I don't know if
>> you would like to be added to the list of people who can change the
>> status of the pending patches for the kernel but if yes, you can
>> create an account on the website:
>>
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/register/
>>
>>> - are you able to subscribe <email> to your mailing list, without
>> requiring a confirmation step?
>>
>> I guess that's a question for Mat :)
>
> The mailing list is currently configured to send a subscription
> confirmation message with a URL, but I can turn that off if needed
> (temporarily maybe?). I think the confirmation step is helpful for
> preventing abuse.
Is it not possible to force someone to be subscribed?
If you disable the option you mentioned, I guess Patchwork maintainer
will need to send an email with a specific message to our ML, right? (I
don't know if what you mentioned is enough)
I guess that if you turn that off, you can then subscribe anybody using
this form: https://lists.01.org/postorius/lists/mptcp.lists.01.org/
Then no need to have manual interaction from their side, right?
Cheers,
Matt
--
Matthieu Baerts | R&D Engineer
matthieu.baerts(a)tessares.net
Tessares SA | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
1 Avenue Jean Monnet, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
9:28 p.m.
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
Hi Mat,
On 21/10/2019 22:12, Mat Martineau wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>>
>>> - are you able to subscribe <email> to your mailing list, without
>> requiring a confirmation step?
>>
>> I guess that's a question for Mat :)
>
> The mailing list is currently configured to send a subscription
> confirmation message with a URL, but I can turn that off if needed
> (temporarily maybe?). I think the confirmation step is helpful for
> preventing abuse.
Is it not possible to force someone to be subscribed?
If you disable the option you mentioned, I guess Patchwork maintainer will
need to send an email with a specific message to our ML, right? (I don't know
if what you mentioned is enough)
Oh, I misunderstood the question to be just about the confirmation part.
Yes, as a mailing list owner, I can add any email address without
confirmation.
--
Mat Martineau
Intel
7:39 a.m.
Hi Mat, Peter,
On 22/10/2019 23:28, Mat Martineau wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hi Mat,
>
> On 21/10/2019 22:12, Mat Martineau wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>>>
>>>> - are you able to subscribe <email> to your mailing list, without
>>> requiring a confirmation step?
>>>
>>> I guess that's a question for Mat :)
>>
>> The mailing list is currently configured to send a subscription
>> confirmation message with a URL, but I can turn that off if needed
>> (temporarily maybe?). I think the confirmation step is helpful for
>> preventing abuse.
>
> Is it not possible to force someone to be subscribed?
>
> If you disable the option you mentioned, I guess Patchwork maintainer
> will need to send an email with a specific message to our ML, right?
> (I don't know if what you mentioned is enough)
Oh, I misunderstood the question to be just about the confirmation part.
Yes, as a mailing list owner, I can add any email address without
confirmation.
Thank you for that! I hope we will be able to get an account soon.
@Peter: by chance, did you have the opportunity to create an account on
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org ?
If yes, what's your username?
Cheers,
Matt
--
Matthieu Baerts | R&D Engineer
matthieu.baerts(a)tessares.net
Tessares SA | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
1 Avenue Jean Monnet, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
7:55 a.m.
On Mon, 2019-10-21 at 15:13 +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
After the last meeting, we said it would be interesting to have
patchwork to easily list pending patches with their status and not
having to maintain the list manually.
I contacted Patchwork maintainers and it seems they are OK to add MPTCP
to the list of projects. But they are asking 2 questions:
> - do you want all of your team to have maintainer status in
patchwork? (ie, should they all be able to update patch states?)
I don't know exactly who would need to have this. I guess everybody who
did a review with an "accept" ("LGTM") should be able to directly
change
the status, no?
I think that should be the preferred course of actions.
Patchwork maintainers are asking me to give them a list of usernames.
With the web interface, I can only get your user ID and email address
but not your username. May you reply to me in private (or to the list)
with your username?
In a quite original fashion, mine is 'pabeni'
Thank you for tacking care of this!
Paolo
8:36 a.m.
Hi Paolo,
On 22/10/2019 09:55, Paolo Abeni wrote:
On Mon, 2019-10-21 at 15:13 +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> After the last meeting, we said it would be interesting to have
> patchwork to easily list pending patches with their status and not
> having to maintain the list manually.
>
> I contacted Patchwork maintainers and it seems they are OK to add MPTCP
> to the list of projects. But they are asking 2 questions:
>
> > - do you want all of your team to have maintainer status in
> patchwork? (ie, should they all be able to update patch states?)
>
> I don't know exactly who would need to have this. I guess everybody who
> did a review with an "accept" ("LGTM") should be able to directly
change
> the status, no?
I think that should be the preferred course of actions.
That would be great :)
> Patchwork maintainers are asking me to give them a list of
usernames.
> With the web interface, I can only get your user ID and email address
> but not your username. May you reply to me in private (or to the list)
> with your username?
In a quite original fashion, mine is 'pabeni'
:)
Added to the list!
Thank you for tacking care of this!
My pleasure!
Cheers,
Matt
--
Matthieu Baerts | R&D Engineer
matthieu.baerts(a)tessares.net
Tessares SA | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
1 Avenue Jean Monnet, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
8:38 p.m.
On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 10:36 +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> > Patchwork maintainers are asking me to give them a list of usernames.
> > With the web interface, I can only get your user ID and email address
> > but not your username. May you reply to me in private (or to the list)
> > with your username?
>
> In a quite original fashion, mine is 'pabeni'
For the first time in my life 'pkrystad' was already taken, so I am
'steve515'. Don't ask.
Peter.
My pleasure!
Cheers,
Matt
3:59 a.m.
Hi Peter,
Wed Oct 23 22:38:47 GMT+02:00 2019 Peter Krystad :
On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 10:36 +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>
>>> Patchwork maintainers are asking me to give them a list of usernames.
>>> With the web interface, I can only get your user ID and email address
>>> but not your username. May you reply to me in private (or to the list)
>>> with your username?
>>>
>>
>> In a quite original fashion, mine is 'pabeni'
>>
>
For the first time in my life 'pkrystad' was already taken, so I am
'steve515'. Don't ask.
It seems that you have two accounts: one with your @intel.com email address and one with
your @linux.intel.com one. You can see that using the search feature, type
"Krystad" and wait for the list to appear.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?submitter=77742
[https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=&submitter=7...]
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?submitter=77730
[https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=&submitter=7...]
Because patchwork works with usernames, do you think we can use pkrystad and change the
email address? Just to avoid delegating to "Steve" :)
Cheers,
Matt
1:56 p.m.
Hi,
On 21/10/2019 15:13, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
I contacted Patchwork maintainers and it seems they are OK to add
MPTCP
to the list of projects.
Thanks to Jeremy from ozlabs.org, a new project has been created for us!
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/mptcp/
In theory, everything is setup, we should see all new patches listed there:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/mptcp/list/
Everybody who answered to my previous message have been added to the
maintainer list.
@Peter: It seems your email address is the @intel.com one. I guess it
should be the @linux.intel.com one. Do not hesitate to contact Jeremy
Kerr <jk(a)ozlabs.org> if there is an issue. Feel free to add me in cc if
needed ;-)
Jeremy also asked me to forward this to the maintainers:
We have some tools that allow you to interact with patchwork from
the
command-line (or automate through your preferred workflow). Check out
the git-pw, pwclient and pwnm-sync tools, at:
https://patchwork.readthedocs.io/en/latest/usage/clients/
Please let your other maintainers know about that too. Keep me posted
if you need anything else set up for your patchwork instance.
Happy patchworking!
Cheers,
Matt
--
Matthieu Baerts | R&D Engineer
matthieu.baerts(a)tessares.net
Tessares SA | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
1 Avenue Jean Monnet, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
685
days inactive
699
days old
12 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Florian Westphal -
Mat Martineau -
Matthieu Baerts -
Paolo Abeni -
Peter Krystad